Seven critical factors for a successful Participatory Strategic Planning (PSP)
In early
2015 I conducted a Participatory Strategic Planning for a consultancy business.
For this I applied the Participatory Strategic Planning (PSP) approach, which has been developed by the
Institute of Cultural Affairs.
The
Strategic Planning consists of six key steps,
0. Intake
formulation of the focus question
1. Formulation / Review Mission, values/ Trend analysis and
environmental scan;
2. Practical Vision;
3. Underlying contradictions;
4. Strategic Directions;
5. Operational planning.
The method
Step 0: Intake and
formulating the focus question
Before step
1 takes place in the strategic planning process, an essential step is
necessary, to move forward. This is the
intake and the formulation of the focus question.
The
ownership of the organizational change starts at the intake. Asking the right
questions and getting the right people at the table are crucial conditions for
enabling a successful strategic planning.
The focus question is the starting point of the participatory strategic planning, through
which the progress of the planning is monitored. This question is a perfect
guide in monitoring the development of the client’s and group’s ownership
during the planning process.
Step 1: Values, Identity, Mission,
Trendanalysis and Environmental scan
Shared values and identity build the foundation, why people commit themselves to a group or organization. Increasingly, identity and values are the pillars for an organizational strategic plan. They are part of the mission statement, that explicity answers the question ‘Why are we as organisation on earth?’
Shared values and identity build the foundation, why people commit themselves to a group or organization. Increasingly, identity and values are the pillars for an organizational strategic plan. They are part of the mission statement, that explicity answers the question ‘Why are we as organisation on earth?’
The
trendanalysis is a tool that analyzes the development taking place in the context, which are
influencing the organization. During the environmental scan opportunities and
threats are mapped in a systematic manner. Both tools will help to answer the
question if the existing organizational mission is still relevant or need to be
modified.
Step 2: Practical Vision
This phase builds on the dreams and the positive energy of the group. In an associative way, the participants create a new perspective of the future of the organization or group. At the end, participants have defined a vision for a defined period of time.
This phase builds on the dreams and the positive energy of the group. In an associative way, the participants create a new perspective of the future of the organization or group. At the end, participants have defined a vision for a defined period of time.
Step 3: Underlying obstacles
Before participants reflect on the strategic priorities for the future, they look at the underlying obstacles that hinder them in achieving their future goals. During this session, a self-reflective process is facilitated in researching the current situation why the organization is not realizing their future dreams. This phase helps to take a step back and observe from a distance and have a fresh watch at the current reality. This is a crucial phase were the transformation is taking place. Participants can not blame others, but are guided in a thorough process of self reflection.
Before participants reflect on the strategic priorities for the future, they look at the underlying obstacles that hinder them in achieving their future goals. During this session, a self-reflective process is facilitated in researching the current situation why the organization is not realizing their future dreams. This phase helps to take a step back and observe from a distance and have a fresh watch at the current reality. This is a crucial phase were the transformation is taking place. Participants can not blame others, but are guided in a thorough process of self reflection.
Step 4: Strategic Directions
Once the blocks have been mapped, the group starts with the formulation of the strategic priorities. This phase helps the group to formulate a new strategic focus that will deal with the opportunities and the threats. The challenge is to provide a new perspective on the current situation. In this session participants will be challenged to develop new products & services, identify new markets and new modes of working.
Once the blocks have been mapped, the group starts with the formulation of the strategic priorities. This phase helps the group to formulate a new strategic focus that will deal with the opportunities and the threats. The challenge is to provide a new perspective on the current situation. In this session participants will be challenged to develop new products & services, identify new markets and new modes of working.
Step 5: Operational planning
Based on the selected strategies, the group defines a one-year plan including milestones and a three months operational plan. During this phase tasks and responsibilities will be divided. Commitments will be made on the implementation and monitoring the progress of this plan. It is crucial in this stage that the conditions and available resources in time and money are communicated to enable the implementation of the operational plan.
Based on the selected strategies, the group defines a one-year plan including milestones and a three months operational plan. During this phase tasks and responsibilities will be divided. Commitments will be made on the implementation and monitoring the progress of this plan. It is crucial in this stage that the conditions and available resources in time and money are communicated to enable the implementation of the operational plan.
Critical factors for Success
There are 7
critical factors, which determine if a Participatory Strategic Planning will
become a success.
1. The Intake, ensuring commitment from the
leadership
The intake
is a crucial phase in the PSP. From the beginning to the end the senior
management has to take ownership of the process. During the whole process of
planning up to implementation the senior management has to lead and to monitor
the development of the focus question and the implementation of the plan. Will the
key question be answered? If the
leadership does not take their full responsibility the process is doomed to
fail.
2. Quality of participants
The quality
of participants will determine the outcome and successful implementation of the
plan. Not only senior management should be involved, but also staff from all
levels in the organization. Diversity , knowledge and views from different
perspectives to bring in as much viewpoints as possible. An adequate selection
of participants is needed for a successful outcome of the participatory
strategic planning.
3. Quality of facilitation
The quality
and experience of the facilitator will be of crucial importance in helping the
group to explore new territory. The facilitator not only needs to know about
attractive and innovative facilitation methods, but also is required to know
how to deal with group dynamics,
emotions of fear and anger and moments of unexpected resistance.
Resistance and conflict are valuable moments for facilitating change.
4. Conditions for implementing the strategic plan
should be clear
The
conditions for implementing the change and the strategic plan should be clear
from the beginning. Staff from the organization should know from the beginning
how much time, resources and support from the senior management is available
for implementing the strategic plan. The commitment and seriousness from the
management should be clear and therefore, they need to communicate these
conditions clearly during the participatory strategic planning event. Especially time for doing for example
training, skills development or innovation should be allocated by the senior
management. If staff do not get the extra time and the resources to implement
changes, a successful implementation is doomed to fail.
5. Follow-up
Plans get
adjusted all the time. Most strategic
plans get adjusted during the implementation due to unforeseen changes in the
contextual environment, changes in the organizaiton or change of staff. Mostly a plan is implemented successful in
case an organization is able to adjust the path during the journey. A good plan
is more than half of the work, but a successful strategy can only be
implemented if the organization is able to deal with the challenges it meets on
the road. Therefore, regular
follow-up (at least (bi) monthly) is
needed ensure a successful implementation.
6. Documentation is done by the organization
It is not
the facilitator who is doing the documentation of the participatory strategic
plan, but it is required that the organization is documenting and writing the
strategic plan themselves. If real commitment comes from the senior management,
it is up to them to write, document and disseminate the strategic plan. In most
cases when the strategic plan is written by the facilitator, it becomes a paper
tiger and ends in a desk drawer. So, it is important during the intake and
preparation of the participatory strategic planning to make the client
responsible for the documentation and dissemination of the strategic plan.
7. Keep the momentum and ensure that
implementation continues straight after the participatory strategic planning
event
Due to the
participatory process many participatory strategic planning events gain a lot
of enthousiasm, joy and energy with the group. Therefore, it is important that
the momentum is continued after the strategic planning event. The participants should become the owners of
the implementation process and the senior management must have the courage to
trust, to facilitate and delegate parts of the implementation to the staff. Every
moment of delay in the process, will take away the energy and the momentum with
the staff in the organization. So the energy and the momentum should be
continued. Therefore it is important that the working groups, that are created
at the end of the participatory strategic planning have formulated challenging
milestones for the quarters to come. If
they have the opportunity to celebrate a victory within considerable time, the
energy can be maintained and continued.
A book I
can really recommend and is worthwhile reading, is the book ‘TransformationalStrategy’ written by Bill Staples. It describes the process of participatory
strategic planning in detail, it puts the method in today’s context and it
gives some helpful and useful tips and tools on how to facilitate it
effectively. The book contains some valuable case studies from the profit and
non-profit sector and it provides some checklist on how you prepare a
successful participatory strategic planning.
See>>> TransformationalStrategy’ written by Bill Staples. The Participatory Strategic is part of the Technology of Participation methods (TOP).
I like your seven points, Simon. I have always spent lots of time on documentation, so it looks good and gets out quickly. How do you coordinate having senior management do the documentation and finalize the plan with getting the implementation going quickly?? I also appreciate your point of having clarity in advance what resources are allotted for the implementation. Do you have stories and / or guidelines to share for how to do this?
ReplyDeleteGreat post, thanks Simon. I reviewed Bills's book at http://martingilbraith.com/2013/02/12/transformational-strategy/
ReplyDeleteMartin, thanks for sharing. Yes, indeed Transformational Strategy from Bill Staples is a very useful and practical book. Thanks for sharing your blogpost.
ReplyDeleteJim, thanks for your questions. Normally my client arranges a secretary or an office manager to do the documentation. They make photos from all the outcomes from the workshops and then rework it to a document. After the participatory strategic planning I share samples with the senior management and advice them on how they can further transfer all the results from the workshops in a documented strategic plan. I already arrrange this during the intake. Of course it makes it easier for the client if all the documentation is done by the facilitator, but over more than 20 years experience it is less effective for the implementation. If the senior management has to sweat and work on it after the PSP event it is more effective and durable and they remind better what they have decided. It also happens that participants write each a chapter of the strategic plan. So the structure and outline is proposed by me,, and then tasks are divided under the management team members or stafff and then they write the strategic plan themselves, and somebody,, mostly an office manager, assembles and completes the strategic plan. Really, the organization has to show blood, sweat and tears to become owner of their own strategic plan. Yes, clarity about resources. Yes, I have som examples in my early days when I did strategic plannings with African communities in the Netherlands. By that time a lot of plans were made on assumptions, such as getting soft loans or funds. When it appeared in the follow ups, that nothing was done and groups got discouraged, since then I discuss with the senior management that they can only implement the strategic plan based on what is at the moment of the planning available, and not what is assumed to be available in the future. Since then my participatory strategic planning event have become much more effective. Even when I did 4 years ago a strategic planning for a volunteer assocation for peer to peer coaching for people getting deaf. At the end of the strategic planning they became aware, that with the available resources they could not invest their time to implement change. At that time it became clear, what already existed underneath for a long time. Their was not commitment to continue, and a couple of months later the group decided to dissolve themselves. This can also be a result of a partcipatory strategic planning, but then people accept that something has to die, if it has to die. Otherwise people get frustrated and can even have conflicts over years. So therefore, it is crucial to communicate about the available resources and time during the strategic planning. It makes a lot underneath feelings visible and discussable.
ReplyDeleteWonderful article Simon. Thanks for sharing. Very useful.
ReplyDeleteLuc, thanks for your compliments. In what way is it useful for you?
ReplyDelete